Monday, June 13, 2005


Anyone care to debate whether this case was about politics or the truth? I'll take 'politics' and give you 5-1 odds. It was clear to me before the case started that the DA had a vendetta against Jackson that clouded his judgment. A more carefully investigated, better planned case might have gotten a partial win, but this egomaniac wanted to go for the brass ring. So what does the DA say now when every juror is saying he didn't prove his case? Idiot.


Post a Comment

<< Home