Monday, June 13, 2005

NOT GUILTY!

Anyone care to debate whether this case was about politics or the truth? I'll take 'politics' and give you 5-1 odds. It was clear to me before the case started that the DA had a vendetta against Jackson that clouded his judgment. A more carefully investigated, better planned case might have gotten a partial win, but this egomaniac wanted to go for the brass ring. So what does the DA say now when every juror is saying he didn't prove his case? Idiot.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home